Thursday, June 25, 2009

Oscar finally does something right!

The Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences made the biggest change to the Oscars that I can remember in my lifetime... There will now be 10 Best Picture nominees. I think this is a good thing, although I wish thet would have done it last year.

The Academy realizes that they need to bring more commercially successful movies into the mix, especially after many vociferous complaints that "The Dark Knight" was snubbed. I wasn't exactly happy about it either.

So, the hope is that more commercial fare will be nominated, instead of the usual artsy-fartsy Masterpiece Theatre stuff. How many people actually watched "The Reader?" Or will the Academy refuse to pander to the masses and just nominate more of the same boring stuff?

As for what movies could be helped this year, I am not sure because I haven't seen too much. I am told that Pixar's "Up" is a possibility, and people are even talking up "Star Trek." Don't get me wrong, I am a fan, and "Star Trek" was a great movie, but I I don't know if I would call it Best Picture material. It pales in comparison to "TDK" which transcended its popcorn movie conventions and changed the game in so many ways. It is one of the best movies I have ever seen. Director Christopher Nolan says he probably won't continue the "Batman" franchise because it is virtually impossible to top "TDK," and I think Heath Ledger's untimely death may have something to do with it as well.

"Public Enemies" is also a contender now, because it is viewed as an epic movie with the potential for great performances, but appeals to the mainstream.

The studios are bitching about the new rule, and are complaining that the have to make more movies to target Oscar voters and how Oscar campaigns will cost money in these tough economic times. First of all, if times are so tough, why are A-list actors still being paid $25-$30 million? Secondly, why don't they just drop all of the Oscar baiting and campaigns and just make good movies? Look at "The Departed." Scorsese said he didn't care about awards, he and his cast and crew just wanted to make a great movie that people would enjoy, and it won several awards, including Best Picture. Also, After 10 years, Pixar has yet to make a bad movie, and I am pretty sure the main goal of John Lasseter and the gang is to entertain people, not to win awards. Look at how good "Iron Man" was. Also, maybe some good comedy movies may finally get their due respect. Some comedies with sharp writing like "Tropic Thunder," "Shaun of the Dead," and "Borat" could have benefitted under the new rules.

This is probably one of the few times I can say to Sid Ganis and the folks at the Academy, "Job well done."

3 comments:

Nonni said...

You are assuming that Academy voters will cast their ballots for todays"comedies" and for action movies. I don't think that the majority of voters over the age of 60 will vote for movies "mainstream" viewers see. Do you think that Transformers 2 (raking in 16 million on opening night) will be nominated for BP? I find this confusing and don't see it making a difference.

Nonni said...

I have to add that the academy is doing this so more "young" movie goers will watch the SHOW!!! This all translate to $$$.

Mr. Tucker said...

As long as Michael Bay is nominated for best director, I will be happy!